Hi Nico, this is GardenStone. In my last reply on your runes article, there wasn’t a word directed to you.
It was all meant to Tyriel’s reply, which I considered unfair. A reconstructional approach needs to discussed with valid historical arguments, maybe supported by mythological information, and he did that only seemingly but not factually.
So keep the good work up. Asatru needs both approaches, magically and historically.
Kind regards,
GS
Thanks for clearly that up, it was hard to tell if it was directed at me or not – Maybe I was being paranoid. I get a lot of hate mail on this blog (simply because I don’t like a band), so I guess I was being over-protective.
Shame about the thread getting locked but it was all getting out of hand.
But you’re right about reconstructional approaches.
Thanks,
Nico
8th February 2012 at 7:35 am
Hi Nico, this is GardenStone. In my last reply on your runes article, there wasn’t a word directed to you.
It was all meant to Tyriel’s reply, which I considered unfair. A reconstructional approach needs to discussed with valid historical arguments, maybe supported by mythological information, and he did that only seemingly but not factually.
So keep the good work up. Asatru needs both approaches, magically and historically.
Kind regards,
GS
8th February 2012 at 8:11 am
Thanks for clearly that up, it was hard to tell if it was directed at me or not – Maybe I was being paranoid. I get a lot of hate mail on this blog (simply because I don’t like a band), so I guess I was being over-protective.
Shame about the thread getting locked but it was all getting out of hand.
But you’re right about reconstructional approaches.
Thanks,
Nico